NEC & Baby Formula Lawsuits

If you had a premature infant who suffered necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) you may be entitled to compensation.

Who Qualifies for Compensation?

Parents of premature babies who developed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) after being fed formula containing cow milk may have legal claims against Enfamil and Similac baby formula companies.

You may qualify for compensation through a baby formula lawsuit if your baby was:

  • Born prematurely
  • Used Enfamil or Similac formula
  • Diagnosed with NEC

In many NEC baby formula cases, the infant required surgery to manage NEC. Sadly, some cases of NEC have resulted in death.

What Is the Basis for the Baby Formula Lawsuits?

Baby formula lawsuits are based on research that has long shown that there is a connection between cow milk formulas and NEC in premature infants. Baby formula manufacturers, including Similac and Enfamil, should have properly warned parents and doctors of the risks.

Similac and Enfamil failed to warn the public about the risks associated with NEC and their formulas that are cow milk based. The connection between NEC and cow milk has been known for years.

In the past, medical malpractice lawsuits have been filed against doctors for providing cow-based milk products to premature infants because it is known to cause NEC. However, in those situations, doctors often claimed they did not know about the medical literature that connected NEC and Similac and Enfamil formulas.

Now, baby formula attorneys are going straight to the source and filing lawsuits against the large corporations who knew about their connection to NEC and failed to warn doctors and parents of the dangers.

Enfamil Baby Formula Lawsuits

Our NEC lawyers are currently handling claims against Mead Johnson Nutrition, the maker of Enfamil, for failure to warn parents and doctors about the connection between NEC and their cow milk based formula. If your baby was fed any of the following products and they developed NEC or NEC symptoms, then you may qualify for an Enfamil baby formula lawsuit:

  • Enfamily NeoPro EnfaCare Infant Formula (Mead Johnson Nutrition calls this the “best” formula for premature babies.)
  • Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier
  • Enfamil Premature Infant Formula 20 Cal with Iron
  • Enfamil Premature Infant Formula 24 Cal with Iron
  • Enfamil Premature Infant Formula 30 Cal with Iron
  • Enfamil Premature Infant Formula 24 Cal with Protein
  • Enfamil 24 Cal Infant Formula

These are only a few examples of Enfamil formulas that may have caused your baby’s NEC. If your infant was fed another cow milk based formula and developed NEC, you may still qualify for an Enfamil baby formula lawsuit.

Similac Baby Formula Lawsuits

Our NEC lawyers are also reviewing claims against Abbot Laboratories Inc., the maker of Similac baby formula. If your premature baby was fed any of the following and developed NEC or symptoms of NEC, then you may have a valid Similac baby formula lawsuit:

  • Similac NeoSure
  • Similac Special Care 20
  • Similac Special Care 24
  • Similac Special Care 30
  • Similac Special Care 24 High Protein
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier
  • Similac Human Milk Fortifier Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid
  • Similac Alimentum Expert Care

This is just a sample of the formulas that are often prescribed to premature infants. If your baby was fed another type of Similac formula and developed NEC, you may still qualify for a Similac baby formula lawsuit.

What is Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)?

NEC is a disease that may occur in premature infants. NEC happens when bacteria invade the walls of the intestines, leading to infection and inflammation. This causes a decrease in oxygen to certain organs. NEC may cause destruction of a baby’s bowels and can be fatal.

Symptoms of NEC include the following:

  • Metabolic acidosis
  • Intolerance to formula
  • Feeding residuals
  • Green fluid in the abdominal wall
  • Decreased bowel sounds
  • Trouble breathing
  • Bradycardia (slow heart rate)
  • Abdominal distention
  • Lethargy
  • Increase or decrease in stools
  • Jaundice

NEC gets worse over time, especially if the cow based milk formula continues. Identification of symptoms and immediate treatment is essential. When treated appropriately, most babies who develop NEC can recover and live a normal life without complications. However, in the worst cases, NEC can result in death.

An initial diagnosis of NEC requires close observation of symptoms by a pediatric doctor. Blood testing, cultures, abdominal imaging, and blood gas levels may also be used to make a diagnosis.

Treatment of NEC

Babies who develop NEC are typically treated by immediately discontinuing feeding of the formula and beginning strong antibiotics. Babies are placed on intravenous nutrients until the infection is controlled and intestinal tissue is healed.

Drainage of the gastric system may be necessary in addition to circulatory support. If NEC causes the tissue of the intestines to become dead and decayed, then surgery may be required to remove affected tissue of the intestines. This can lead to many complications, including but not limited to short gut syndrome.

Proof that Cow Milk Formula Can Cause NEC

There is significant scientific evidence that dates back decades linking cow milk formula to NEC. However, much of the literature has been published in the last 30 years.

  • 2010 – The Journal of Pediatrics published an article that found infants who were fed breast milk or formula with human milk fortifiers were 90% less likely to develop NEC than babies fed cow milk based formula.
  • 2011 – The U.S. Surgeon General released a Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding of infants who had been born premature. It stated that premature babes who are fed cow milk formulas are more likely to develop NEC by 138%.
  • 2014 – Expert Review of Clinical Immunology noted that there is significant evidence that cow milk formula leads to NEC at higher rates than breast milk.
  • 2015 – Pediatria published a Portuguese study that found a 50% reduction of NEC for babies who were fed breast milk instead of cow milk formula.
  • 2016 – Breastfeeding Medicine published a study involving more than 1,500 infants that determined there was a lower chance of NEC among babies who received breast milk.
  • 2019 – Cochrane published a study of more than 1,900 babies who were born prematurely that found cow milk based formulas were seven times more likely to lead to NEC than breast milk.
  • 2021 – Journal of The American Academy of Pediatrics published information that premature infants who were given only breast milk had a reduction in NEC by 77%.
  • 2021 – Pediatrics and Child Health published a study that found breast milk reduced the incidence of NEC in premature infants.

These studies were well known by Enfamil and Similac; however, the companies failed to warn doctors and parents about the risks associated with their cow milk formulas and NEC. The companies failed to place a warning on the formulas and may have even tried to cover up the link between their baby formula and NEC.

Is There a Recall of Enfamil or Similac Formulas?

No. There is not currently a recall of cow milk formulas made by Enfamil and Similac.

However, parents deserve to be informed about the risks of cow milk formula, particularly for premature infants. Once informed, parents and doctors can make a decision about how to proceed with safely feeding their babies.

About the Firm

Attorney Thomas L. Young
Headquartered in Washington, D.C., Young & Partners’ practice is national in scope, as we have trusted co-counsel relationships with leading law firms in all fifty states.

Founding Partner Tom Young has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for governmental entities and individual victims of various major disasters over the past 25 years, including the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the 2015 Volkswagen “dieselgate” emissions scandal, recent devastating hurricanes along the East Coast, the ongoing nationwide opioid epidemic, PFAS “forever chemical” contamination and more. The firm also represents individuals in mass tort actions who were allegedly harmed by various dangerous and defective products such as the herbicides Roundup and Paraquat, medical devices like hernia mesh, the pharmaceutical Zantac, talcum powder based consumer products (baby powder), infant formula associated with necrotizing enterocolitis in premature newborns, and service member veterans harmed by water contamination at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune.

Young holds a Bachelor’s of Arts in Economics and a Juris Doctor, with Honors, from the University of Florida Levin College of Law. While there, Young was one of the first students awarded a Certificate in Environmental & Land Use Law. Young’s practice includes educating and assisting consumers, businesses, nonprofit organizations and government entities in understanding their rights as they pertain to losses due to negligence or disaster, in both state and federal court. Importantly, we only represent plaintiffs, not defendants, and never insurance companies.

He is a member of the Phi Eta Sigma National Honor Society, the Golden Key International Honor Society, the Florida Bar, the District of Columbia Bar, the State Bar of Arizona, the Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C., the Florida Justice Association, the Arizona Association for Justice, and the American Association for Justice. Young was the 2012-2018 President of the Civil Justice Foundation and a former AAJ state delegate.

Patrick Mickler has extensive experience in the legal industry representing clients in complex national mass tort litigations involving product defects and pharmaceuticals as well as general negligence matters. Mickler has also assisted clients, including governmental entities, in various major disasters, including the nationwide opioid epidemic, and the ongoing PFAS “forever chemical” environmental catastrophe.

In addition to his work as an attorney, Mickler is also a principal of The Injury Board (IB), an exclusive membership organization of well-respected plaintiff trial law firms across the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada committed to preserving the civil justice system. Mickler often leverages relationships formed through IB to joint venture with member firms on numerous mass tort cases.

Mickler holds a Bachelor’s of Arts degree from Washington and Lee University in Journalism and a Juris Doctor, summa cum laude, from Mitchell Hamline School of Law. He is a member of the American Association for Justice, The Florida Justice Association, and the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C., as well as the Florida Bar and the District of Columbia Bar.

Contact Us

    Young & Partners, LLP
    1025 Thomas Jefferson St NW, Suite 810
    Washington, DC 20007

    For your free case evaluation, please fill out the form below or call us toll-free at (888) 463-0699.

    Your Name (required)

    Email Address (required)

    Phone Number (required)

    Your Question or Comments

    *By clicking the "Send" button below, you consent to receive automated calls/texts from, or sent on behalf of, Young & Partners, LLP and related entities, including promotions, offers and discounts. You also consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy. Consent is not a condition of any purchase.

    Very happy with his representation. Demonstrated a superior level of knowledge and expertise in a very complex and specialized proceeding.

    Jonathan, Assistant General Counsel, Fortune 500 Retailer, New York

    Tom and his team have a calm, patient manner and was a great help to me dealing with the frustration
    that comes with a legal claim. His knowledge of the process and his remarkable problem-solving abilities are rare indeed.
    My calls or questions were answered eagerly and quickly and I was updated at every turn of events.

    Ron, Business Owner, Florida

    We chose Tom Young to handle our Deepwater claim for losses caused by the spill. Tom’s firm made the filing and subsequent
    requirements easy to understand and respond to. He did not give up when we were offered -0- for our losses. He worked with us
    to develop proper and factual responses to requests for information. In the end, we received a full settlement of our claim. We believe
    this was due in large part to the diligence of Tom and his exceptional staff who kept us advised and guided us every step of the way.

    Anonymous

    Our business had a great experience with Tom’s firm. He and his team successfully filed a BP Oil claim
    for our business. His team was always available to speak with us throughout the process, provided excellent
    advice and counsel and we would not hesitate to engage his services again. Highly recommended.

    David, Fortune 500 Fast-Food Franchisee, Florida
    During the process leading to and through our BP loss claim, Tom Young and his staff kept me well informed and worked
    on our behalf to get the claim settled in the most efficient way possible. Personal service and professionalism was outstanding.
    Scott, Architect, Florida

    Tom and his team were diligent and persistent in representing me and my business. They were always available
    and kept me thoroughly informed. And they succeeded in obtaining a significant judgment in my favor.

    Rick, Business Owner, Florida

    Tom and his team handled our case with expertise and got the desired result. Appreciate all the hard work
    as this went on for a long time but in the end they did exactly what they said they would and delivered!

    Bret, Business Owner, Florida